Monday, October 18, 2010
Still trying to reach
Saturday, October 16, 2010
Catching Up
Friday, October 15, 2010
Glad to hear from you
Wednesday, October 13, 2010
Are publishers making lots of money? How come authors are paid so little?
From this publisher's viewpoint the blog did seem to "get it wrong" on many counts, and their observations seem to be designed to scare the pants off authors who will be afraid to trust their publishers, afraid to copyright their work, and afraid, or completely convinced, they will be cheated and every publisher is only is out to get them whatever they do. But there are a lot of publishers and those things may be true of some, though I don't know anyone like that in any of the publisher's lists to which I belong.
Basically, at my company we make far more from our e-book sales than from paper book sales. We do paper books because our authors want them, and as an author, I want them for myself, and certainly understand why other authors do, too. This is something we choose to do, despite the fact that paper books do not sell well and are three times the work, for less than half the income. Yes, that means we get less than half what you make on paper book sales to retail markets.
In fact, we make far more on our sales of classic e-books than on sales by the living e-book authors we publish -- all those college kids downloading their reading lists, yunno. And we price them at less than $5 so we make about the same on a sale for one of them as on a sale for an e-book by a living author, where we share in the income. Without the classics we publish from the public domain, we could not afford to stay in business. So we are not making a lot of money on what we publish for living e-book authors, either, but we believe in the merit of what we publish, in the merit of what you write, and are pleased to be able to represent your work.
I know there are publishers out there who don't pay their authors very well, sometimes as little as 15% (same percentage as for a paperback) for an e-book sale, while e-book prices are MUCH lower. And 15% of 6.50 (our e-book list price) would be very little. With us you make 40% on a Write Words web site sale, or $2.60 per book (and we no longer discount that price) and you get 50% of what we get from any distributor for a book that is sold from other distributor sites. Remember, the distributor usually keeps most of the money from the sale, paying us only a percentage which we split evenly with you.
A paper sale from us earns you 15% of the list price, or $2.54 for a book priced at $16.95, even though the publisher doesn't get to keep that much since paper costs went up. I am required to pay you 15% by our contract and will do so unless I lose money, in which case the book will go out of print. Don't panic. I don't expect that to happen to anyone's book any time soon, though I am now making quite a bit less than $2.54 per book, we still have plenty of margin before we lose anything.
With e-books, the prices and percentages vary for EACH sales site. We sell on amazon.com; Amazon Kindle; Mobipocket; Fictionwise; Barnes & Noble; All Romance; Omnilit; and Coffee Time. For that you get the e-books prepared and submitted for sale in whatever format the sales sites require (each has it's own file preparation requirements and cover size specifications that must be met and preparing all those different electronic data files is time-consuming), we track sales, and pay our authors every cent every quarter in the quarter AFTER we receive the funds.
Having said that, it's perfectly true that some sites sell and pay better than others. Coffee Time sells very little for us (1 book in the last three months) and doesn't pay a lot, either, though they are scrupulously honest in reporting sales and scrupulously on time with payment. Each site/store sets it's own pay schedule and if we don't like what they pay we are free not to sell our books there.
If one of your e-books sells from the Write Words web site the customer pays $6.50, and you make $2.60. If it sells on Omnilit, they pay us 70% of what they collect at that site, but they offer discounts on some titles and their book club members get even further discounts. Now the sales site SETS the discount price. I just give them my List price and they each decide how much discount to give their customers. So much off because it's new. So much again, for book club, or for for repeat customers, etc. So the customer may get your book from Omni for $4.40 instead of $6.50 and we may receive 70% of that, or $3.08 of which you get 50% or $ 1.54 instead of the 2.60 you'd get if it sold from us. Customers like the big sites. Most customers have a favorite site and only buy from that one place. If we don't sell on all of them, we don't sell well. That's a simple fact of life.
Other sites have special plans like library lending of e-books. If some "library" customer downloads your book at Barnes & Noble, you will be lucky to get $ 0.69 cents. Each store has a kiosk that lets customers download a library title for a very low price into their e-machines. The staff person does it for you while you wait, so you don't have to learn how to download the stuff yourself, and the "borrowed" title disappears from your reader after two weeks, so the customers have to read it in that time, or pay full price to get it back.
You have no idea how frustrating and complicated it is for a publisher to track 300 plus authors and all their works and sales on eight different major distribution sites and then try to explain why they received $2.60 for one sale and 69 cents for another sale of the very same book! Why Two books that sold on Kindle, sold for two ENTIRELY different prices (one went to a book club member who paid less). After all they both were sold by the very same store! How come amazon.com pays $2.27 for a sale and Barnes & Noble only paid .69 cents for the same book? Both list it for the same price of $6.50, so shouldn't they pay the same? Even I have to admit, that to an author that looks funny.
Logic like the above has no place in the accounting practices of the e-books industry -- it all depends on what discounts they are giving at the sales site in the week of the book's sale, while publishers are paid three to six months after that. The whole thing looks as if it makes no sense at all. I am the first to agree with that. But the alternative is, again, not to participate in the various sales sites. No participation equals No Sales. No income at all. For either of us. That's the bottom line. Do we list everywhere and take whatever they send us? Or do we not sell at all? Because sales at my own site are very limited indeed.
Trust me, I know none of you are getting rich. Neither am I. I do this for love, not for money, though some days I wonder why I do it at all. It's only on days when I'm trying to get folks paid and the computer is in the shop for a week that the frustration factor really kicks in.
Anyway, the computer is back now, and they recovered my M through Z author files. So we can all breathe a big sigh of relief and get back to doing payroll now.
arline
Tuesday, October 12, 2010
Finally got the computer back
Tuesday, October 5, 2010
Dialect- writing tip
Yes, Less is more. Again, we are a nation of poor readers. I grew up reading Frances Burnett’s thick dialect in The Secret Garden, but most readers today don’t have patience to decode all those missing letters and apostrophes in strange places. They go rent the movie, which also has very little dialect. I’ve met people from Northumberland. I wasn’t sure they were speaking English. Dialect can be very difficult to write well. This is a lesson I learned, reluctantly I’ll admit, in a workshop with Diana Gabaldon. She wrote a book about a group of 17th century Scots, and English Outlander. No dialect is a thick as that of Scotland. Diana said she listened to old Scots ballads sung in English and in Gaelic to absorb the rhythm of the speech. There’s a great deal of difference between the speech of the Scots and the Englishwoman, and among the Scots, depending upon their station in life and educational level. But nobody said, “hoot mon!” She changed didn’t to didna, and wouldn’t to wouldna, and added some dated terms like “foxed” for drunk. But most of it was in the rhythm of the language. Because of the sentence construction, English sounded different when the Scots spoke, but their meaning was never obscured.
Monday, October 4, 2010
Scalloped Veal - Recipe

Robert Legleitner’s Scalloped Veal cutlets
1 lb veal cutlets sliced thin.
½ cup flour
6 tbsp. butter
1/4 cup sherry (the good stuff too)
2 tbsp. chopped parsley
4 ounces or so of sliced mushrooms
salt and pepper to taste
Dredge the veal in flour and sauté in butter for 3 or 4 minutes each side. Sprinkle with salt and pepper. Add sherry, parsley, and mushrooms. Simmer for 10 minutes. Should serve 4.
Contributed by Robert L. Legleitner, author of The Golden Legend...German-born archaeologist Kydon Schmidt has a secret that would ruin him.... in the homophobic atmosphere of the 1940s. So when the U.S. Government recruits him for a mission against Nazi artifact collectors, he is not in a position to refuse. Great action and adventure. You won't be disappointed!
